The article processing charge (APC) for this journal is free, and there are no article submission charges, page charges, or color charges.
JIEAS is entirely not-for-profit and depends solely on donations. Your support and DONATION are greatly appreciated. Help us to continue contributing to the visibility and propagation of Open Access research and to make it the default for academic and scholarly publishing.
JIEAS works closely with Organizations, Universities, Academy and Industry to ensure high standards of readability, presentation and impact in all published material. We greatly welcome any types of cooperation like to receive investments and financial support, host existing, publish conference proceedings or books, publish special issues, receive recommendations, and so forth. If you are interested in becoming a partner or sponsor of JIEAS, please don't hesitate to contact us for more details.
Duties of the Editorial Board
These guidelines are based on existing Elsevier policies and COPE Best Practice Guidelines
1. Publication decisions. The editor of a peer-reviewed journal JIEAS is responsible for deciding which of the articles to be published. The corroboration of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
2. Fair play. An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
3. Confidentiality. The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
4. Disclosure and conflicts of interest. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests are revealed after publication. If needed, other appropriate action should be taken, such as the publication of a retraction or expression of concern.
5. Involvement and cooperation in investigations. An editor should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper, in conjunction with the publisher (or society). Such measures will generally include contacting the author of the manuscript or paper and giving due consideration of the respective complaint or claims made, but may also include further communications to the relevant institutions and research bodies, and if the complaint is upheld, the publication of a correction, retraction, expression of concern, or other note, as may be relevant. Every reported act of unethical publishing behavior must be looked into, even if it is discovered years after publication.